• No Comments

Creg Uploaded by. Alexandra Rico. Loading Preview. Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button. resolucion creg de pdf merge. Quote. Postby JustĀ» Tue Aug 28, am. Looking for resolucion creg de pdf merge. Will be grateful. This CREG Regulation establishes the following articles: The connection to to the network backup: CREG Resolution / – Energy supply: through a.

Author: Kigajin Zulumuro
Country: Uganda
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Literature
Published (Last): 27 October 2007
Pages: 319
PDF File Size: 14.33 Mb
ePub File Size: 1.39 Mb
ISBN: 135-9-20304-826-6
Downloads: 1762
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Samuzil

The ITAD reliability index and the incentives and compensations scheme adopted in the methodology are not evaluated quarterly as described in section II, but annually.

The technical impacts for system cfeg quantified by the reliability index ITADwhich was assessed for each operation scheme in study with and without DG. Proposed methodology The proposed methodology consists of a technical and an economic analysis scheme.

The simulation procedure described above is presented on a flowchart in Figure 2 B. Distribution system reliability is evaluated in terms of the mean reliability supplied by an electric utility to its users, compared to its reference mean reliability.

resolucion creg 097 de 2008 pdf files

The maximum value of the demand curves for each load point correspond to its respective data provided of active and reactive power. Candidate 09, National University of Colombia, luisluna84 gmail. This shows that the use of these generation sources allow to solve problems of deficiencies in the reliability supplied by utilities.

The scheme so described is presented in Figure 1. These results allow through a balance between performance and costs, contribute to feasibility studies cdeg DG interconnection in customer installations.

resolucion creg 097 de 2008 pdf merge

From Figure 6 it was observed that the oper ation scheme that does not consider crwg DG interconnection has a high ITAD dispersion around its mean value, however, implementing either of the two studies would reduce this dispersion in different proportions. Although implementing DG is not prohibited in Colombia, no market schemes or interconnection technical specifications have been established for DG.

The location of the 0997 value of ITAD in the reliability incentives model involves certain economic impacts for the electric utility that must be quantified and analyzed. The customers who would install DG units would have a more detailed study, orientated towards calculating the estimated time for recovering investment costs due to the installation of these cre, according to the technology used. English pdf Article in xml format Article references How to cite this article Automatic translation Send this article by e-mail.


Methodology for assessing the impacts of distributed generation interconnection

On the other hand, if the DG units described in either of the two studies are connected to the system, the utility would receive a certain amount of money per year. Once each iteration has been completed, the following reliability indexes are calculated for each load point: The economic impacts for customers who would not install DG units or passive customers were evaluated by a comparative method, that assesses the behavior of the estimated electricity bill of each one of those customers, for the two operation schemes without and with DG.

It is important to indicate that a suitable option for passive customers to perceive profitability with the DG connection in the distribution system would be the execution of a bilateral contract between the electric utility and passive customers harmed by such connection.

Cre, if the DG units described in either of the two studies are connected, the utility should compensate to such customers with a lower annual amount over the case without DG, due to the dispersion of the reliability supplied around the mean reliability would fall. Methodology Considerations The DG units are installed directly by customers and these units operate as backup plants, so that when the distribution system is in normal operating conditions, the DG exclusively supplies to the customer owns the plant.

Although such increases in the electricity bill result from improvements in the reliability supplied by the electric utility, they would be preventing that any of the technologies is economically profitable for passive customers, because the bill price would be higher than the price these customers are able to pay to avoid a cut in the electricity supply.

Additionally, OMS has an integrated power flow to analyze the distribution network in real time. This will ensure a minimum level of reliability for customers. The bonus grows as reliability improves and it is capped at a maximum value. In order to carry out the implementation of the comparative method, it was required the information of the values of CU dg according to the technology used, without considering the incentives crrg compensations scheme cfeg to the reliability supplied.


The DG integration leads to a crrg technical and economic impacts on distribution networks, because power systems were not designed to incorporate power generation sources into distribution levels. Rewards for good reliability can be implemented in ccreg similar way. The economic investments by technology type, of the customers who would install DG units.

The economic savings in the energy bill of each one of the customers who would install DG units. By doing so, a utility may have a more efficient distribution system and greater knowledge crreg its system’s operation. The tariff scheme for energy commercialization in the regulated customers CREG These impacts result from implementing the compensations scheme to ”worst served” customers and they are discussed in the next section IV-C4.

INTEGRATED SOLUTION | Energy Computer Systems

Distribution System Modeling 1. For example, these mechanisms must guarantee to customers, and that the times taken to recover investment costs due to the DG installation, are shorter or equal than those shown in Table 5 cfeg the second study. Hence, some countries have modified their regulatory policies to promote the installation of DG systems, allowing such plants to become competitive compared creb large-scale generators. This is because, despite the CU dg allows a greater variation in the bill behavior of passive customers, the application period is very short, because the DG units operate as backup plants to fault conditions in the system.

If reliability is worse than the dead zone boundary Z2a penalty is assessed.